Why sound in Linux better than Win 7? How to improve it in Win 7?

Digital Sound -> Messages -> Why sound in Linux better than Win 7? How to improve it in Win 7?
02.01.2015 12:57:00
A friend gave me a Linux, and here I was a little afigel. This sound quality Long time no hear. Now, when you want something to listen to, but I'm in the "WIND" I want to howl with anguish, because listening to this shit has no power, overload the system and listen to Linux. The sound of the built-in format mp3 128-196 kb / s. External amplifier, speakers semi. (There are in store sound card SB Live Value, but I am lazy to put that to compare it with the built-in motherboard sound card).

1. Why does this happen?

2. If I did put myself and tie the your SB Live Value is there a difference in sound quality between the built-in sound card and motherboard installed SB Live Value (in PCI slot)?

3. If I buy a ASUS XONAR Essence STX 124 dB SNR will be any difference in the quality of reproduction of simple mp3 128-196 kbps files in Win 7? Or here it is in the decoder mp3 format, which means the quality of the sound card on the playback mp3 file does not affect?

4. What SW. audiophiles think about this issue? Where and how they listen to their tracks, in what format. Will the same difference between Linux and Win 7 as a reproduced sound in the case of a different size?
02.01.2015 13:27:00
Oh, do not deceive me hard! ...
I delude myself happy!
Pushkin "Recognition"
02.01.2015 14:12:00
Dull topic, please do not litter.
02.01.2015 17:11:00
Change the sound difference is unlikely to eliminate. Can
the maximum unload Win7:
- simplify the graphical interface to the limit;
- get rid of unnecessary resident programs;
- disable (carefully!) Unnecessary services;
- Googling for increasing the priority of multimedia tasks.
also adjust the output to the media player through WASAPI (Exclusive). Do not put ASIO4ALL.
02.01.2015 18:13:00

format mp3 128-196 kb / s

- No difference from the iron will not change, then it does not matter at all.
only difference in the programs themselves decode MP3.
, audiophiles - and generally people are not dead yet ears - nothing like listening to.
02.01.2015 18:51:00


audiophiles - and generally people are not dead yet ears - nothing like listening to.

Who would argue But on Linux for some reason it is all the same shit is somewhat similar to the original. )) Something very vaguely))
02.01.2015 18:57:00
In Linux sound heard only in Note 2 (Android), and yes, the difference is significant! Much worse than in Win7 with star. Card X-Fi
02.01.2015 19:39:00
Maxim Ptitsyn

Oh, I forgot to say that I have Linux Mint (like 16th )
02.01.2015 19:41:00
You may listen to
under DOS, there chakras are fully disclosed and MP3 128 kbit / s sound at all like DVD-Audio.
02.01.2015 19:45:00

put update KB2653312, can help. And the current power plan to "high performance".
03.01.2015 2:04:00
quote:
:
Deaf topic, please do not litter.
And it said the man listening to music in mp3, and even in such a bitrate. . . Mdaaaa. . . "Where the world kotitsya?!" (C).

PS: Default, so thick are not trolls. But if you want, I can suggest a couple of forums.
03.01.2015 14:38:00
I want to say the same thing. I L. Ubuntu 14 and W. XP3 (assembly), (going to put W7). A significant difference in the sound, no matter what the player is not set. In the Wind. sound worse. One hypothesis about it says - the sound is not cleaned nor spoils as nothing more than the player "vindovz media player"; all audio goes through it.
03.01.2015 15:01:00

Mr. Shaw nonsense, how many years listening to music in WMP, nothing like that in principle can not be. For MP3 it has quality decoder from Fraunhofer. Through ASIO sound even less liked than WASAPI.
03.01.2015 18:36:00
• Why is "not cleaned" WMP? Yes FIG it is not needed, probably the thing uluchshayzer that likely are not always available for editing or off.
• For embedded map, as a rule, a poor software, with it you can not do anything, only of the player, if he has advanced settings, but I think it's still in the card itself, and "The Sound of built-format mp3 128- 196 kb / s "usually sounds better on a low-quality equipment, t. to. the higher its quality, the more it becomes unbearable to listen to a sound squalor.
• If the built-in sound on my mother, there may be need to update BIOS?
• "What SW. audiophiles think about this issue? "- These tracks can only listen to music lovers, audiophiles are unlikely to indulge yourself MP3 320Kbps or more so than something worse.
• Too shy to even ask about Win7 (I understand you correctly?) - It is of course a license and with all updates?
03.01.2015 19:54:00

If the built-in sound on my mother, there may be need to update BIOS?

experience listening to MP3 on Linux I was not only at home but also in the party, the effect is the same. Linux provides a more realistic sound kachevtennoe wherever I am, "it" was not listening. What does sound so much better on that fear for those who are these changes in sound quality can not hear (have a couple of friends with a dysfunction of the hearing aid ) Interestingly, in one audio track I heard that slander slander text in the background, oodnovremenno music. In windsurfing this text can not be heard even close, but on Linux it (slander text) quite clearly heard. What it says I can not translate, not good at English, but the fact that you can hear quite nerazlichiny in Windows sound speaks for itself. This is for those who somnivayus in improving quality. Can not improve the quality and (say), but where the hell pops audio series, which in Windows simply can not be heard on the physical level? What does the acoustics were quite miserable, but even this nagovorka skoz it was audible.

I hesitate to even ask about Win7 (I understand you correctly?) - It is of course a license and with all updates?

I honestly do not believe that buying a license vindouz I immediately get audiophile happiness.
03.01.2015 21:25:00
A
not share grass names of those magical compositions in which there is "dictated the text that speaketh in the background." I want to know "dysfunction hearing aid"
03.01.2015 21:40:00
Who is not lazy and installed linux, he decided to compare to the sound of the wind to him oh how far, in my topic was very deaf.
03.01.2015 22:39:00

fragmentiki And you will throw those of files are not ordinary people to get acquainted? Maybe I too suffer from dysfunction? There is a suspicion that the background text is the usual drunken mumbling sweaty Niger, well, there is such a style, it seems rap is called.
03.01.2015 23:14:00

one audio track I heard that slander slander text in the background, oodnovremenno music. In windsurfing this text can not be heard even close, and Linux
Indeed, share, pliz, I've found, azhno intrigued!
03.01.2015 23:30:00
Thus, the tasks are set, objectives defined, forward comrades, the victory of communism. knew I that this track would be so important for you haha)) I would have said, check . And so, it is necessary to look for it, good, vskidku, it was kind of like Carbon Based Life Formes (love it, BTW))), although no guarantees. Prosherstit again this divine music for me in the cellar , but it will be a shame if it were not for them ((. How did I know that it's damn serious physical evidence)) For someone Let's not point the finger
04.01.2015 0:46:00
Interestingly, topikstarter say anything, terms such as WASAPI, ASIO, and since about linuh conversation, ALSA. Can start to go to Wikipedia?

Gee! And I'm really thought topikstarter after a stormy New Year's feast so flat postebatsya decided. Especially about 128kbit mp3 to like it. Well what for us flac, dsd, asio and stuff?
04.01.2015 1:15:00


knew I that it is not useful here . Judging by what I read, apparently my Windows (not just me then) once assembled wrong and something it lacks. Although maybe not. On the other hand, look who worked on the ALSA I was plagued by vague doubts that this level of windsurfing just do not feel like it. Only version, I can be mistaken.
04.01.2015 1:46:00
What do you wilt? Obviously the same, it's New Year's thick trolling.
04.01.2015 1:48:00


No, it's not troling. I would not want to disappoint anyone on this subject, but I, alas, quite seriously.
04.01.2015 1:57:00

There are 3 options, 1st post I presented above, the second - in win included uluchshayzery, or vice versa in Linux or system deliberately filthy so bad play music.
third option - something with a head "slyshashego." Here it is and medicine and forums powerless.

What does sound so much better on that fear for those who are these changes in sound quality can not hear
- judging by this I do skolnyayus to last.
04.01.2015 2:40:00
Yes, still. Maybe this will help. The difference can be heard not only in the performance of mp3 files. There is a difference, even when playing music through the VC, do not know what works there when the music twist (like flash player). In general, everything that concerns sound reproduction in Linux runs much better. In terms of better quality (than in Win 7). And not only me (about the "curve" Win 7 is not necessary). Everyone with whom I associate the Windows sounds exactly the same. Equally crappy. A Linux everywhere equally gorgeous , on the part of the sound.

have linux has its own problems, so I do not need to rank as Linux users, I'm just a user. I for example do not like the mouse works in Linux. Everything seems set up, there is no acceleration, but do not like and everything. Play only in Windows. There you see the mouse I like. If it were not like - would play in Linux, for online mouse is a means of survival))) But the music is the opposite.
04.01.2015 8:40:00

IMHO not properly ask the first question in the topic title. I now hear the difference in sound between Linux and Windows 7 in favor of the former, but I have it on Cubietruck + Volumio, and Windows on the laptop, like even customize it "to the sound of" listening APlayer. Next to an external asynchronous USB - DAC, that is, both running a piece of iron sources digits. But I do not be surprised if some Ubuntu merge windsurfing if its installed on the same laptop.
The difference is, as Lossless, and on small bitrates mp3 / aac +, but to describe its meaning do not see - and iron and tract, and hearing, and the KDP, in the end, all different.
04.01.2015 11:07:00

equally crappy. A Linux everywhere equally gorgeous
Well this well poluchetsya, comrade. No matter what zvukovushka what PSU, what motherboard. Put Linux and get audiophile computer? All Followers of this branch would sit on your Minto.
04.01.2015 12:19:00
In order not to talk nonsense to continue (not a shame to be honest) and dot the "e" propose to banish RMAA with linux.
This must be the power of even not very experienced users. If
linux driver serviceable, the differences will not be at all.
If the difference in the sound decoding only "mp3 128" here questions to the decoder at linuh (in win they licked and shine as you know that). In general, a 128 kbit very much from the original signal is left in principle. . We can only think of the spectrum. that was cut off, but not recovered. "Ground impossible to crank back"

p. s.
Self-hypnosis - a great power. . .
04.01.2015 13:08:00
Prompt what linux try to avoid having to configure a whole slew of drivers, purely for the sound desirable live CD or USB flash drive.
04.01.2015 21:35:00


I have Linux Mint, as far as I know it luchshiyvariant mint. Especially for beginners. There seems to have everything that concerns the wood.
05.01.2015 3:05:00
and whether you have the possibility to compare the sound is not Lossy-formats, and anything decently?
Losless, and 24 \\ 96 - and it is better if it would be something of a record or Telarc Records Cesky. Will be able to?
05.01.2015 4:37:00
For anyone interested - High-quality sound in Linux and a Linux-like operating systems .
House on the stationary computer in dual Bute two wasps - Open Suse 13. 2 + Windows 8, Linux on a sound definitely better at work "beam" of different systems on one set Calculate Linux 14. 12. 1 (Gentoo Base) sound very good, tried on different maps Asus (DS, D1, ST).
In Linux no problems with sound if all conveniently packed and will be found the kernel modules (aka driver) under the right iron. If the distribution is specially sharpened by sound, tried Ubuntu Studio and Audiophile Linux with real-time kernels, it is still better, but they are preferably put on a separate computer, only for sound, since it will be difficult to work with the desktop. How
player for Linux, I recommend Clementine 1. 2. 2 , almost a full analog "pumped" Foobar, there is a media library, playlists, biography, lyrics, album art, equalizer, Internet radio, and so on. He plays many lossless formats, have concluded for ALSA, Pulse Audio et al., in Linux sounds great, there is a version for Windows, but only outputs the sound through the DS (DirectSound), so that an adequate comparison does not work, but with Foobar (Win) full parity with Linux.
05.01.2015 4:45:00
You guys are somehow not there oppression. It was stated in the subject that tra-ta-ta sounds better than. . . . In response, proposed by the authors is something out there to drive (RMAA), put the license, update logs, and so on. , T. E. Begin to sculpt "spherical horse in a vacuum", from which I conclude that you do not have installed on the same computer running two - L. and W. and compare the forehead, you can not at one and the same music signal (composition) at the hearing. However, it is to admit that the sound players L. (dozens of them out there, but there are some of the best), someone may not like compared to WMP. But, in any case, it is necessary to listen, not to look at the spectra of the conditional "sinus".
05.01.2015 12:41:00
quote:
:
You guys are somehow not there oppression. It was stated in the subject that tra-ta-ta sounds better than. . . . In response, proposed by the authors is something out there to drive (RMAA), put the license, update logs, and so on. , T. E. Begin to sculpt "spherical horse in a vacuum", from which I conclude that you do not have installed on the same computer running two - L. and W. and compare the forehead, you can not at one and the same music signal (composition) at the hearing. However, it is to admit that the sound players L. (dozens of them out there, but there are some of the best), someone may not like compared to WMP. But, in any case, it is necessary to listen, not to look at the spectra of the conditional "sinus".
Emmmmm. . . that is, to take part in this highly intelligent discussion is necessary: ​​
1. Put in Ubuntu or Mint dualbute
2. the Convert multiple albums from flac to mp3 128kbit
3. Disable asynchronous DAC and the built-in Realtek peretknutsya
4. Take a few hours of their alternate indication life listening mp3 128kbit tracks on one of the players for Linux, and Windows to WMP.

I did not miss anything? Sorry to ask, but for highly intelligent conversation Openelec come down?
05.01.2015 13:54:00
If we RMAA = spherical horse. . .
Now 100% sure that Monsieur - troll
05.01.2015 14:38:00
8) Well, here I already have to deal with the execution of 3 points. I will not. At the expense of openELEC - come down. I note in passing, outside threads, MP3 to be missed on the quality of life in most cases; other "heavy" in size formats will be redundant.
05.01.2015 14:49:00
Mp3 I have only in the car, and then only because the head unit Flake does not eat, and MP3 from a friend for the automotive stick pumped. Flake home everywhere. The smartphone also. Foobar (asio) and compare openelec constantly - foobar definitely wins. Only here to convert to mp3 128kbit and switch on the realtek I have no desire. Apparently I am not fit for this discussion.
06.01.2015 0:41:00

and whether you have the possibility to compare the sound is not Lossy-formats, and anything decently?
Losless, and 24 \\ 96 - and it is better if it would be something of a record or Telarc Records Cesky. Will be able to?


downloaded their favorite songs in FLAC-e. I understand that now I have to buy a couple, three terabyte external drive, a FLAC-and that would listen to the same things, but in Linux
C WINDOWS situation some countries. What flac, mp3 that the difference is not drammaticheskogo, though there is. . Most likely cause is built zvukovushka. Yes, and I have a standard amplifier (ah, the lamp where you... )
06.01.2015 0:47:00
Sophisticated connoisseurs:
How implemented to work in the audio player nas synology, they like on Linux, right or wrong? Better than in win7?
Sound Card creative x-fi hd usb.
06.01.2015 1:11:00
It seems to be related comrades should be activated in the spring or autumn, winter why something started?
06.01.2015 3:58:00
I suggested to compare known quality recording to eliminate the effect of the sound
different converters from MP3 to WAV. That's when - you can decide what and how it is influenced by
. A different decoders, but on different systems - compare just does not make sense.

PS I am afraid that your favorite song - still not the same quality recorded, so you can
was really appreciate the difference. . .
06.01.2015 4:36:00
Yes, the "song", it is certainly a word that can penetrate the wall Beaton, if you apply it to track Prodigy)) I have my audio library call "song" is not because there Kirkorov yes Malikov collected , but because I feel for her most tender chuykvstva . Dub Step, Trans, GOA, all this for me songs
06.01.2015 14:19:00

What are your speakers \\ headphones, which you can hear the difference between the operating system, if not secret?
And Prodigy quality far enough away from the reference to listen to them the difference.
06.01.2015 16:23:00

What are your speakers \\ headphones, which you can hear the difference between the operating system, if not secret?

amplifier and speakers microlab Pro 2. http: // www. microlab. com /? r = stereosystems & amp; st = full & amp; id = 29 to pay for them, something raiёne $ 200 (can not remember now). Although the difference is audible at all, on any acoustics, it is striking to many.

Normally, that would hear better sound I raise the bitrate, listen without any computer CD drive, put on headphones Hi-End, get much better sound. In the case of Linux sound is improved immediately, all starting with bit rate 128k and above.

Another interesting fact. I could barely understand English, so that's where I'd like to see some sort of an interesting doc. film in English (which I understand is weak), I could not stop watching it in Windows, because that just does not distinguish words. If I am overwhelmed with Linux and look the same dock. film in Linux, all the words are clear, although my knowledge of this language is very weak.
06.01.2015 16:32:00
If
windows deliberately killed, that it kind of sound, it's no problem operating system, the problem is not very pryamorukih user.
06.01.2015 16:32:00
The author is quite obvious troll.
otherwise would already reported, what measures it has taken to improve Windows. Fortunately, the advice was enough.
06.01.2015 16:43:00
Let trolls nazdorove
But by the way, with regard to the preferred genre: trance. There are many live instruments? All primitive electronic synthesizer + "Tyniec-Tyniec-Tyniec." The same infected mushroom or goa trance you can at least listen to the 96 BSC (and listened to 10 years ago, there was a time). 128 kbps for this, even a lot. There is no criterion of "natural sound".
06.01.2015 17:04:00

same infected mushroom or goa trance you can at least listen to the 96 BSC (and listened to 10 years ago, there was a time).
fun you here
06.01.2015 17:04:00

quote:
There is no criterion of "natural sound".
Personally, I agree 100%. But this is by no means only of the genre.
However, I suggested simple plan: why the author did not put a small piece of the path even in MP3 128Kbps, where he hears a voice in the background of Linux and which can not be heard under Win7. Yet quiet. If anything, you can see any track in the Creative wavestudio or sony soundforge, in the end, you can twist in Sonar X3 or even in Adobe Audition, but so far no files are given. Some words. I know quite a few complaints unfortunate people who suffered from the left is the old operating system, but the emphasis is not willing to see that this is the problem, rather than something else. But I'm sitting in the bushes, staring eyes watching dalneshem events.
Thread pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Digital Sound -> Messages -> Why sound in Linux better than Win 7? How to improve it in Win 7?
info@www.world-of-digital-sound.com